Search for: "State v. Words" Results 701 - 720 of 36,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm by John Pollock
  But Turner may not be the last word even on the federal constitutional right to counsel in civil cases any more than Betts v. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
Unless a legislature decides to title a law the “Retroactive Punishment of Child Molesters Statute,” the Supreme Court of the United State has held in Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or… [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 2:01 am
Word search Penal Law run on New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS) on December 20, 2006: S8515 GOLDEN -- Includes possession of a loaded firearm within criminal possession of a weapon in the second degreeSame as A 12121 RULES COM LentolSUMM : Amd S265.03, Pen L Includes the possession of a loaded firearm with intent to use such firearm unlawfully against another within the class C felony of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Felonies are defined by using the words "confinement" and "imprisonment" interchangeably. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:55 pm by Gary A. Watt
  This time, I'm using United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
However, due to Mr Grice’s persistence in maintaining that Mr Woodward had been struck off, his motivation and reasoning for posting the words, and his state of mind at the time, a further £8,000 in aggravated damages was considered appropriate to ensure that Mr Woodward was properly vindicated. [read post]