Search for: "Steve Vladeck" Results 701 - 720 of 1,336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2011, 9:01 am by Irina Vayner
Jack Goldsmith gave a keynote address to a very full house, and then Bobby Chesney (UTexas), Steve Vladeck (American) and I had a chance to respond and interact. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Exceptional Child Center: Supremacy Clause doesn’t provide implied private right of action [William Baude, SCOTUSBlog; James Beck (implication for product liability); from the losing side, Steve Vladeck/Prawfs] Please, SCOTUS, kill off for good the awful Calder v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:58 am
University of Miami professor Steve Vladeck raised questions about how this affected their work as clerks for a Judge A. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In a book review at Jotwell, Steve Vladeck argues that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 3:26 am
Last Friday, the Washington College of Law at American University convened a day-long conference devoted to recent proposals -- including most prominently that of our new Attorney General -- to create new, special "national security courts" to handle (i) detention decisions; and (ii) criminal trials, with respect to suspected al Qaeda operatives and associates.One of the organizers of the conference, Steve Vladeck, is absolutely right that the highlight of the day was… [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:17 pm by Alfred Brophy
Bellia (Notre Dame), Heather Elliott (Alabama), Evan Lee (UC-Hastings), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Jim Pfander (Northwestern), Amanda Tyler (UC-Berkeley), and Steve Vladeck (American). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:46 am by Kenneth Anderson
Jack Goldsmith will deliver the keynote address and the commenters are Robert Chesney, Deborah Pearlstein, and Steve Vladeck; Dan Marcus will moderate. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:50 am by Cody Poplin
Gabriel Schoenfeld, and Steve Vladeck, tackled a vast array of important legal and policy questions surrounding classified leak prosecutions, the responsibilities of the press, whistleblower protections, and the future of the Espionage Act. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:27 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  There may be intent differences between the two — although it is important to keep in mind Steve Vladeck’s recent post and the fact that paragraph (c) of the Espionage Act does not contain a “reason to believe” requirement — but I have heard no plausible argument that the First Amendment applies differently to The New York Times and WikiLeaks. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Amanda Frost and Steve Vladeck discuss standing and the challenge to President Barack Obama’s immigration policy, urging the Court to “accept the case, hold that the plaintiffs lack standing, and send it back to the lower courts with instructions to dismiss. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:08 am by Howard Bashman
” And at his “One First” Substack site, Steve Vladeck has a post titled “Bonus 22: The Mifepristone Mess, Continued; The Fifth Circuit kinda sorta froze part of Judge Kacsmaryk’s deeply flawed mifepristone ruling in a deeply flawed ruling of its own, one that puts the Supreme Court in a very awkward position. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:15 pm by Marty Lederman
With Steve Vladeck, I've posted some of my own observations about the new legislation, in two parts, at Opinio Juris. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Steve Vladeck
Steve Vladeck As is abundantly clear from the Supreme Court’s June 2011 decision in Stern v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 10:18 pm
HT: Steve Vladeck, tipping me from the land of rain and smoked herring [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:06 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  It includes chapters from, among others, my fellow Lawfare contributor Steve Vladeck. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:26 pm by Zachary Spilman
However, Steve Vladeck over at Lawfare Blog takes it to a whole different level: Separate from the policy side of this story, there’s a critical legal issue here that hasn’t yet been resolved: The AP story reports that one of the objections lodged by counsel for the defendants is that the new rules violate the defendants’ constitutional right to counsel. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
In Slate, Dahlia Lithwick and Steve Vladeck argue that some political conservatives are attempting to paint Chief Justice John Roberts as a villain in an attempt to drive voter turnout in this year’s election. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 1:18 pm by lennyesq
An excellent analysis (recommended by Professor Tribe) is included in this Twitter thread by Steve Vladeck, who makes the following points: Critically, [Trump] is not arguing that the 11th Circuit was wrong to stay that part of Cannon’s order that enjoined DOJ from using those documents. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:04 pm by Kenneth Anderson
”; Commentator: Peggy McGuinness Andrew Kent, “The Court’s Fateful Error in Ex parte Quirin, the Nazi Saboteur Case”; Commentator: Steve Vladeck Wayne Sandholz, “Treaties, Constitutions, Courts, and Human Rights”; Commentator: Chris Whytock We welcome you to join us at BYU and at future interest group meetings. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
UPDATE: Steve Vladeck has a nice post on whether defendants at the commissions have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel here. [read post]