Search for: "Stone Adoption Case"
Results 701 - 720
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
In contrast, traditional sports such as basketball are not copyrighted; no one owns basketball or basketball’s rules and anyone can adopt the rules of the National Basketball Association. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 7:57 am
As for employment, this is not a set-in-stone criterion either. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
To be sure, it’s never been set in stone, and not all feds have played ball. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:06 pm
So maybe I shouldn't throw the first stone. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
The case culminated in a two-day bench trial last month. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
EPA.[14] Although journalists (with their usual tunnel vision) view this case as simply challenging the EPA’s authority to regulate fossil-fueled power plants, the actual facts are more complex and involve the replacement of an Obama proposal with a weaker rule adopted by the Trump Administration. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
[Such liability], in the case of pioneer drugs, has an inevitable effect of penalizing precisely the research and innovation that [the law] sought to foster. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 7:50 am
EPA adopted these rules after the Supreme Court, in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
In a third case, Morton Salt Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
We can’t win elections in the future unless we adopt a message that most of the changing population can embrace. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
When it passed, a number of men abruptly departed New York to carry the news of the Ordinance to Philadelphia, where the Constitutional Convention adopted the identical fugitive slave clause a few days later.These fugitive slave provisions were expected to be implemented. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 5:19 pm
Immediate family means an individual's minor or adult children, including adopted children and stepchildren, an individual's brothers, sisters, parents, adoptive parents, and the spouses of those individuals. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:35 am
But, you’ll be able to find cases and statutes on it. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:56 am
And ISIS with its foolishness and the stupidity of its leadership and many of its followers became a stone among stones in this game, exploited to achieve their goals. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:02 am
VHCC cases (one of the strongest weapons in our armoury) were about to implode within weeks. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
The case itself is not particularly remarkable. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Both C-60 and C-61 adopted the same approach - notice and notice. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:03 am
David Allen Green at Jack of Kent explains why the Paul Chambers case matters. [read post]
