Search for: "Strange v. Powers"
Results 701 - 720
of 964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
The Phoenix lost last year to Appalachian State by 45-21 and by 44-7 to the Citadel, which shows that South Florida is no offensive power. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
The PACT Act has some carve-outs to this obligation, but the bottom line is a powerful new pressure to comply, even in cases of serious uncertainty about important speech or information. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
’s and other countries’ surveillance compulsions – their laws requiring (rather than forbidding) production of data – take a different approach, turning on the location of the custodian of stored data rather than the data themselves.[15] For example, the United Kingdom’s Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA)[16] explicitly applies to data stored outside the UK. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
Melevsky v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:59 pm
Yet another day has come and gone without the United States Supreme Court issuing a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Chapter V therein lists a number of “circumstances precluding wrongfulness”. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
” The video is still strangely relevant (change Nader with Jill Stein and the same thing applies today). [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
My point is to suggest, in broad strokes, not just the strictures of narrative-normative anarchy, but also its substantial relevance for the expression of power among collectives with different conceptions and rationalizations of the power to compel, or better to make individuals think they are exercising free choice, when in fact they are deeply embedded in systems designed to manage, constrain, predict, and discipline choice. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Edwards case -- at page 717.)To go into questions of the unwritten powers of General Convention, or the Executive Council, or the Presiding Bishop would be to enter a tangled thicket of church polity and governance, since there are no provisions in any of the Church's foundational documents which confer any adjudicatory powers upon those entities. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
Although a treaty generally cannot itself establish a Federal criminal offense, see, e.g., Hopson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
As the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
He found it strange that there was any question of not implementing Strasbourg judgments, noting somewhat drily that the Dutch believed in pacta sunt servanda. [read post]
