Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2007, 10:47 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a substantial defense” – rather than the standard… [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm
” State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
” In Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
But the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that incorrect advice on matters that are collateral to the criminal case don't make out a case of ineffective assistance under the Supreme Court's Strickland v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
That the AEDPA (anti terrorism and effective death penalty act) requires federal courts to give state courts great deference in interpreting the law, and that great deference combined with the fact that the supreme court has never held that a failure to give a closing argument is ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:43 am
In State v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm
., State v. [read post]
