Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
See, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Maryland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm
That’s the meat of the holding from Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:05 pm
On Wednesday, March 31, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:55 am
INS v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
The Court ruled that a lawyer who fails to inform his client that the consequence of a guilty plea is automatic deportation is incompetent under Strickland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
In Utah v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Weekly D355bCriminal law -- Jurors -- Peremptory challenge -- Gender discrimination -- State's explanation that it had a bad feeling about juror was not a valid gender-neutral explanation for strike of last male on panel -- Trial court erred in upholding strike based upon fact that state had struck an equal number of male and female jurors -- It is improper for court to consider overall makeup of jurors that have been seated in determining sufficiency of gender-neutral reason… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:36 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
United States Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
As the court explained in Arellano v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:13 am
We conclude that the Court of Appeals of Indiana unreasonably applied Strickland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
Check the Berghuis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
United States, No. 09-989. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
That issue was raised by the state of California in Harrington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
In the latter case, the Court has directed the parties to address a question in addition to those raised in the petition: Does AEDPA deference apply to a state court’s summary disposition of a claim including a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
The majority held that the error was prejudicial, and the state court’s contrary conclusion was an objectively unreasonable application of the governing case, Strickland v. [read post]
