Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 14,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Section 230 was enacted as a response to Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
Rita v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In that case, V.L. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Commodity Futures Trading Comm. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
"This amendment," she said, "is intended to present a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:14 pm
I admit crim pro is not my strong suit, but why isn’t the conduct described in Islamic Shura Council v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Baker or Reno v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm
New York does not have a strong Anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
Chris Cillizza has a piece in the WP that argues that the world is too splintered and partisan and complex, and communication and persuasion too difficult, for the president of the United States to succeed. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
As documented by the fact that not a single amicus brief was filed in the capital case Bobby v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:01 am
The key issue: whether a choice-of-law provision in a marine insurance policy can be rendered unenforceable if its enforcement would conflict with the “strong public policy” of the forum state. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:58 pm
Last week, we wrote briefly about EMC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
In Matter of Johnson v New York State Div. of Parole (2009 NY Slip Op 06359 [4th Dept 8/27/09]) an appeal from the dismissal of an Article 78 petition challenging the denial of parole, the Fourth Department reversed and ordered a new parole hearing upon a finding that the Parole Board failed to weigh all of the relevant statutory factors and that there is "a strong indication that the denial of petitioner's application was a foregone conclusion. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
There is a strong semblance between this case and the 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
David NosalUnited States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:26 am
*R v Cornwall [2009] CA [Jury – guidance when journalist should declare conflict of interest] D was convicted of a knife murder. [read post]
