Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA" Results 701 - 720 of 35,726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
In 2006, the California Supreme Court rejected claims that an Alameda County Superior Court judge had advised a prosecutor to remove Jewish jurors from a death penalty trial. [read post]
., the California Supreme Court’s employee-friendly Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ruling earlier this year, employers must remain more diligent than ever to prevent and mitigate costly wage and hour litigation. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm by Ilya Somin
This issue isn't before the Supreme Court in Grants Pass. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
This opinion of the California Supreme Court -- in response to the Ninth Circuit's certified question -- is unanimous, and reading Justice Evans' opinion, you can potentially see why. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm by Whitney Hodges
The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the California appellate court to be resolved in accordance with this holding. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 728 (1999), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the doctrine was adopted by our country’s Founders in the Constitution itself rather than the Eleventh Amendment, solidifying its place in American jurisprudence. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
California, in which the Supreme Court held that laws imposing penalties on people for narcotics addiction violated the Eighth Amendment because they punished a state of being, not a specific action, like drug possession or sale. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm by Uthman Law Office
Watson (1981) 30 Cal.3d 290, (Watson), the California Supreme Court concluded that a person who kills another while driving under the influence of alcohol may be charged with second degree murder if the circumstances support a finding of implied malice. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 9:49 am by Mark Tabakman
CSI Electrical Contractors and issued from the Supreme Court of California. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am by Amy Howe
California, the city continues, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibited the state from making it a crime simply to be a drug addict in California, even if there was no proof that the defendant had ever used drugs in the state. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]