Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2021, 5:23 am
The case is entitled Travis Taylor, Terry Barrows, and Layton Ferrell Duke v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Other court decisions addressing areas excluded from mandatory negotiations within the meaning of the Taylor Law include City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 and Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Other court decisions addressing areas excluded from mandatory negotiations within the meaning of the Taylor Law include City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 and Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
In its November ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:25 am
That snarkiest of justices, John Roberts, called The Brethren “advice columnists” in his first and only solo dissent in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
SynQor, Inc v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:52 pm
A Critical Race History Exchange on the Beginnings of Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am
Supreme Court has misleading opponents and potentially huge impact – we weigh in on the side of transparency & prosecution of bad actors: CalNonprofitsGene: Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In Ramos the Appellate Division held that an employee serving a disciplinary probationary period may be terminated without a hearing for violating the terms of the disciplinary probation.In contrast, in Taylor v Cass, 122 AD2d 885, an employee won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after the court determined that the employee had been improperly dismissed while serving a "disciplinary probation. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:51 pm
Practice & Integrity 1 (2019), available at DOI: 10.35122/jospi.2019.878137 [cited as Soskolne & Baur] [3] See Watson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:46 am
The decision (Nunes v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
Lancaster County District Attorney’s Office v Walker– local reporter Carter Walker submitted FOIA requests to try to discover what Lancaster Penn’s District Attorney does with forfeited property and how proceeds were spent. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
The Board’s reliance on Government of India v Taylor [1955] AC 491 (HL) in this context is unhelpful. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:38 pm
“Como hombres y mujeres de ley y orden acataremos la decisión, no sin antes agotar todas las vías”, aseguró Marrero. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of February 8, 2021 from Wise Law on Twitter: Court sides with mentally disabled man after immigration hearing questions legitimacy of his marriageInternet harassment: Caplan v Atlas Prof. [read post]
