Search for: "The Bank of Scotland" Results 701 - 720 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court will hear submissions on whether the failure to bring into force certain amendments to the Extradition Act 2003 in Scotland gave rise to a breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Byers and others v Saudi National Bank, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 05/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard 3rd December 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard… [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Mongolia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 769 (25 July 2007) North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 (25 July 2007) Madan & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 770 (25 July 2007) London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 763 (25 July 2007) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 774 (25 July 2007) Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Brown v The Scottish Ministers (Scotland), heard 14-15 Jun 2017. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:26 am by Legal Beagle
”However, during Mr Hume’s term at the Council, the south of Scotland local authority has found itself at the heart of persistent financial failures with the loss of millions of pounds in bankrupt Icelandic banks, and recent revelations by Scotland’s Finance Secretary John Swinney that Scottish Borders Council has a staggering debt mountain of TWO HUNRED & SIXTY TWO MILLION POUNDS.Speaking at the Scottish Parliament, Mr Swinney also revealed Scottish… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Advocate General for Scotland v Romein (Scotland), heard 6 Dec 2017. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:55 am by John A. Gallagher
Some of more recent awards are:*  Broker-Dealer Awarded $417,000 Award by Arbitration Panel in U5 Libel/Defamation Case *  Royal Bank of Scotland Forced to Pay $2.05 Million on U5 Breach of Contract/Defamation Arbitration Claim*  Sun Trading Hit With $1, 335,000 by FINRA Arbitration Panel in U5 CaseClick to read an excellent summary of some FINRA Arbitration Awards from prior to 2012. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
It's rather like Scotland saying it was "governed" by the village of Brigadoon.)The fate of the Potemkin "Diocese of Quincy" foreshadows what will probably happen to all of the other Potemkin villages currently being propped up by the coffers of ECUSA, except for Pittsburgh and possibly Fort Worth (depending on how the Texas Supreme Court rules -- any day now, by the way). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:09 am
Tentative topics include: 1) Privacy and information security 2) New transacting & marketing models, e.g. apps, platforms, sharing economy, smart contracts, ubiquitous computing 3) Paperless trade 4) Legal technology & computational law 5) FinTech, Banking Regulations, Crypto-currencies. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:57 am by John Jascob
Despite more recent changes to the Commission’s waiver process, Waters said not enough had been done to eliminate defects in that process, which Waters said had been highlighted in Commissioner Kara Stein’s 2014 dissent from a waiver granted to Royal Bank of Scotland Group, plc.Waiver procedure. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
A brand’s IP, consumer protection and marketing strategies may be separate documents but they are inextricably connected.Technology support and AI tools are super helpful for monitoring BUT should always be used in conjunction with human intervention.Enforcing brands on social media platforms is important for protecting brand value, protecting the consumer against confusion, fraud, including fake or infringing support pages, accounts, profiles, advertisements, products and merchandise.Global… [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba  v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV, heard 4-5 November 2019. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:39 am by Legal Beagle
She claimed Mrs Clark’s tenancy was regarded as valid by the executors when it was not, as the bank had not given consent. [read post]