Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 5:37 pm
However, a full-scale assault on the country is currently underway. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
The case is US v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm
Check it out at Michtavi v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 pm
Belote v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
Many times people forget that step, which can save a lot of time and grief.Then it draws a sliding scale of effort required based on factors such as the likelihood of finding the rights holder, the age of the work, the status of the creator (professional/amateur), and the proposed distribution of the work (narrow, easy takedown v. widespread distribution). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:09 pm
Many times people forget that step, which can save a lot of time and grief.Then it draws a sliding scale of effort required based on factors such as the likelihood of finding the rights holder, the age of the work, the status of the creator (professional/amateur), and the proposed distribution of the work (narrow, easy takedown v. widespread distribution). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:18 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
The case is all the more striking because more than a century ago, in Jacobson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
Said Kitchin LJ: "I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make an order for an inquiry or account but that in the light of the scale of the infringements it is appropriate that the cases should be transferred to the [bargain-basement] Patents County Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:44 am
IHC 40/11 Gray & anr v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd IHC 41/11 Coogan & anr v Same IHC 72/11 Same v Same IHC 73/11 Same v Same These concern the “phone hacking” cases of Andy Gray and Steve Coogan and are applications for disclosure against Glenn Mulcaire which were adjourned from 18 January 2011. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am
The exceptional advocacy of the lawyers involved in the case of Indigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
Alderman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:25 am
Tinker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:01 am
”); People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
By Sophia Williams “We’ve filed a lawsuit challenging AI image generators for using artists’ work without consent, credit, or compensation. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am
He filed an amicus brief supporting the cert petition in NIFLA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
” In Clapper v. [read post]
