Search for: "The People v. Smith"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
Smith largely repudiated the method of analysis used in prior free exercise cases like Wisconsin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
People v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Does adultery affect my divorce case? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
Smith and People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:15 am
The wackiness of Watson is not the result but the reasoning: Watson distinguishes rather than overrules Smith v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
As well as what we should expect.Beyond this larger point, I did want to make one other particularized critique of Judge Smith's view -- or, perhaps more accurately, of the FLSA (depending on whether or not you think that Judge Smith's done the right thing here, which I think most people would).Judge Smith's holding is based upon the intuition that since the nurses prefer this regime, and since it was done for their benefit, the FLSA time-and-a-half… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm
Consumer Protection Division v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
In the Virginia case—titled Landini v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am
The opinion, People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Co., 15 AD2d 526, 526 [1961], affd 11 NY2d 1026 [1962]; compare Smith v New York Cent. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Hunter, "Towards Amalgamationist Governance: Governor Hutt and Contradictions in British Colonial Policy Regarding Aboriginal People in Western Australia"5. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 12:30 am
For example, there is a review of Perfecting the Constitution: The Case for Article V (Lexington Books) by Darren Patrick Guerra, and a review of Dean Smith's A Theory of Shield Laws: Journalists, Their Sources, and Popular Constitutionalism (LFBScholarly Publishing). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
, (Croatian Political Science Review (December, 2018)).Christopher Sundby & Suzanna Sherry, Term Limits and Turmoil: Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am
Supreme Court’s Decision in Jam v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In a decision marked as "Non-Precedential" in the case of Kent v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:10 am
In Canada, in Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:40 pm
Smith, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle, J. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:05 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
