Search for: "Thomas Roe"
Results 701 - 720
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
The next body of cases involves less traditional alignments among the Justices – generally, the Court’s left (Stevens, Ginsburg, and Souter) and right (Scalia and Thomas) wings joining together to form a five-Justice majority. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:38 am
My letter to the justice who authored the Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:00 am
Foster (Thomas A. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:48 am
The ghosts of Lochner and Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
At 10 a.m. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Actually we're a little shocked at the facts of this matrimonial action involving Thomas Liotti. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:43 am
Just to make things a little interesting, I hope some Senators propose: 1) treating these artificial persons as subject to a reinstituted draft for military service, where the CEO would have to serve if the corporation cannot — while the physical criteria for service might have to be waived, such accomplished managers certainly could assist in managing procurements; 2) seeking to expand the size of the Supreme Court to 15 — even if not successful a healthy debate will ensure. 3) asking… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
Law Office of Thomas F. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:46 pm
Roe a decade ago. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:29 pm
Thomas School of Law delivered an address on "The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
Justice Blackmun's majority decision in Roe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:30 am
Examples are provided from Congressman Bingham, Justice Bradley, and Judge Thomas G. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Gore (or perhaps Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
Our next Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, sitting patiently as the senators blather on (Slate has this great chart comparing how many minutes she speaks with how many the senators do), was finally asked about the death penalty near the end of the day yesterday. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
For all the talk of "modesty" and "restraint," the right wing Justices of the Court have a striking record of ignoring precedent, overturning congressional statutes, limiting constitutional protections, and discovering new constitutional rights: the infamous Ledbetter decision, for instance; the Louisville and Seattle integration cases, for example; the first limitation on Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
I'm thinking here of Clarence Thomas, for example, whose credentials for the appointment were quite thin. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
Anthony Appiah, Judith Butler, Thomas C. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
Quite frankly, I'd far rather that Judge Sotomayor be examined on this question than on more substantive doctrine (do you like Roe? [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
It may be that this is inevitable; it may be that it is largely impossible to have a particularized and productive discussion about anyone who is likely to make it through the Supreme Court vetting process, short of the kinds of personal accusations that characterized (and in many respects marred) the Thomas nomination. [read post]
