Search for: "Thomas v. No Named Defendants" Results 701 - 720 of 1,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Claims against other defendants were dismissed.In Hogan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
This is the kind of Kafkaesque idiocy that gives the legal profession a bad name. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:53 am by Julius Stobbs
 Per Caspian Pizza v Shah [2017] EWCA Civ 1874, as the goodwill of the Claimant extended to the same locality as that claimed by the Defendant, the s.11(3) defence was defeated. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, so the amicus to defend the judgment would ordinarily be appointed by (and typically be a former law clerk of) Circuit Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:09 am by Dan Epps
” Such orders are rare, but not exceptionally so; just last term, Justice Neil Gorsuch was called upon to enter such an order in a case in which the other eight justices had been named as defendants and thus had to recuse themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:03 pm
The Alabama Supreme Court provides some background on this in Thomas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
” The relevance of 19th-century cases on patents, such as McCormick v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
Six Unknown Named Agents might offer a path for judicial remedies for unlawful conduct has largely been eviscerated, with Kennedy’s opinion for the court in Ziglar v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Namely, whether a conviction for robbery qualifies as a “violent felony” under ACCA even when (as in Florida and several other states) the offense may be committed using a negligible amount of force. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by Carlos Schidlow
("Thermo"), and named Individual Defendants, Thomas Kelly, Donald Kania, Homa Bahrami, Arie Huijser, Jan Lobbezoo, Jami Dover Nachstsheim, James Richardson, and Richard Wills (collectively, "Defendants"), finding Plaintiff failed to adequately plead that Defendants’ violated Section14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and that Individual Defendants violated Section 20(a) of the… [read post]