Search for: "Toy v. Toy"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2018, 9:54 am
We will continue to advocate for exemptions to Section 1201 so that people—not manufacturers— control the appliances, computers, toys, vehicles, and other products they own, but this process is unreasonable. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:09 am
., Serial No.88359361 [Refusal to register FLIPPABLE FIRMNESS for "Online retail store services featuring bed frames, foundations, mattresses, pillows, toppers, and bed sheets" on the ground that the specimen of use does not show use of the mark in connection with the services identified in the application.]May 18, 2022 - 1 PM: Evolutionary Guidance Media R&D Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Cir. 2003) (quoting Jacobs v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"** Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:10 am
January 24, 2013 - 2 PM: Central Garden & Pet Company v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 1:45 am
It explores the work of Child Evangelism Fellowship, the group that won an important Supreme Court victory in 2001 in Good News Club v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
In the Kings County (Brooklyn) Criminal Court case of People. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:40 pm
By Eric Goldman Lambotte v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:00 am
But these registrations are still alive for some ancillary products: hand tools, namely, pocket knives; children’s activity books and various desk items; key fobs and plaques; clocks and collector coins; banks; and toys. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
Mattel, Inc., Opposition No. 91176791 [Section 2(d) opposition to MOTOWN METAL for toy vehicles based upon the registered mark MOTOWN MUSIC REVIEW for "retail gift store featuring music, clothing, reading materials and souvenirs"].November 18, 2010 - 2 PM: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:25 am
” Meanwhile, the Ninth Circuit in Mattel v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
Gebhardt v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 12:57 pm
Sorema">Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:52 pm
The Court will consider this question in No. 06-989, Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 126 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 1997) (Kuwaiti business was party to the arbitration); Ministry of Defense of Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
There are also three summary orders of interest.United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) - at the end of May. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
Great British Teddy Bear Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:57 pm
, Commonwealth v. [read post]
