Search for: "U.S. v. Chambers" Results 701 - 720 of 2,742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm by Florian Mueller
In an amicus curiae brief recently filed with the Ninth Circuit in FTC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:47 pm by Michael Froomkin
 In his chambers and in his court room I saw the best that the U.S. legal system has to offer. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes,[6] greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads,[7] differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions,[8] and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” of the product in many U.S. states.[10] International Smuggling and Counterfeiting Puts Consumers at Risk… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Instagram has announced it will remove the number of “likes” visible from posts in the U.S. in an attempt to decrease competitive pressure between people, and promote safety and mental health. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am by Chris Castle
 (The case is cited as Eight Mile Style, LLC and Martin Affiliated, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nearly 60 percent of the 110 people who have moved to the Hill from the influence industry since the midterm election went to work for House Democrats, a likely result of the flurry of new jobs available after the party regained control of the chamber. [read post]