Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
Coop. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
Gratifyingly for the IPKat, who is always happy to see his undomesticated cousins appearing in Patent judgements, this was expressed using the “lions in the path”/”paper tiger” language developed in Pozzoli v BDMO. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm
., LC, v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
GPX International Tire Corporation et. al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:27 am
” Sorrells v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
Retroactivity As mentioned last night, the proposed legislation would be "retroactive" to November 2006 - the date of DOC's first initiation of a CVD case against NME imports (Coated Paper from China). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
I helped litigate - and win - the first ever US CVD investigation of NME imports (Coated Free Sheet Paper from China) back in 2006-07, representing the main exporter. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Question: Do you own a fur or leather coat? [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:09 am
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:14 pm
Specifically, United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
The Willms settlement order imposes a judgment of $359 million that will be suspended upon Willms’s surrender of bank account funds and proceeds from the sale of his house, personal property, and corporate assets, including a Cadillac Escalade, fur coat, and artwork. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
The Willms settlement order imposes a judgment of $359 million that will be suspended upon Willms’s surrender of bank account funds and proceeds from the sale of his house, personal property, and corporate assets, including a Cadillac Escalade, fur coat, and artwork. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
" on Coatings World. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
In what is probably the most widely cited case on this defense in the District, Acker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
They filed a main request and auxiliary requests I to V together with the statement of the grounds of appeal.Claim 1 of the main request read:1. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Coats Sandel v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
People v. [read post]
