Search for: "US v. Henry" Results 701 - 720 of 2,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
| Trade secrets in the US | European Copyright Society | Merpel in Eponia | Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors | CJEU activism on copyright | EU Commission unveils future copyright reform path | Music publishing and copyright | Dreaming of copyright, new eLAW event | Trade mark right exhaustion | VW trade mark disaster | Linking and copyright | elite media takes IP wrong. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Adam Schwartz
Grossman, and Henry Bluestone Smith of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
”  Henry Holt & Co., to Use of Felderman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
Among other sources, Kantorowicz draws heavily on Shakespeare, whose Richard II and Henry V dramatize each monarch’s struggle with his human fragility in the face of a divine task. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
| Trade secrets in the US | European Copyright Society | Merpel in Eponia | Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors | CJEU activism on copyright | EU Commission unveils future copyright reform path | Music publishing and copyright | Dreaming of copyright, new eLAW event | Trade mark right exhaustion | VW trade mark disaster | Linking and copyright | elite media takes IP wrong. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
" The Parkers further alleged that IB owed them, as trust beneficiaries, a duty of fair dealing, which it breached by violating certain FINRA rules.[2] Specifically, IB failed to use "reasonable diligence" in the opening and maintenance of their trust account; know the "essential facts" concerning the trust, as its customer; "have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities [was]… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Sorrell, 258 AD2d 782, 783 [1999]), and where it is clear from the language of an agreement that the parties intended to be bound and there exists an objective method for supplying a missing term, the court should endeavor to hold the parties to their bargain (166 Mamaroneck Ave., 78 NY2d at 91; see also Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, 483 [1989] cert denied 498 US 816 [1990] [before rejecting an agreement as indefinite, a… [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 6:10 am by Anna Maria Stein
He then recalled the principle affirmed by the CJEU on the intention of use when applying for a trade mark registration.The panel then discussed Sky v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 2:14 pm by Sophie Corke
Katfriend Henry Yang summarised the reasoning of the Court of Appeal thereto in the recent case of Autostore v Ocado.GuestKat Rose Hughes considered the tricky balance to be struck in determining when pre-clinical data plausibly supports a therapeutic effect, as was raised in a recent Board of Appeal decision (T 966/18). [read post]