Search for: "US v. Jacobs"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
I use the word of EU law for this sort of situation". [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In exchange, he allegedly used his influence to protect three businesspeople and benefit the government of Egypt. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:22 pm
The Eight Circuit gets around Georgia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
The EPO and US approaches start by considering the prior art whereas the UK courts, following Pozzoli v BDMO, start with the skilled person and his or her CGK, putting that background knowledge in the spotlight and at the forefront of the mind of the skilled person for the later stages of the analysis.The skilled person, memorably described by Jacob LJ in Rockwater v Technip as "a nerd".The courts have therefore tended to be careful in expanding out the… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
RICO’s original intended use was to prosecute the Mafia. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review: "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews: European Law Design… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 30 [week ending Sunday 25 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case T‑11/14 Grundig Multimedia… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
" Rebecca has more on this case, which reminded me a little of the classic Jacob & Young v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This Kat, however, thinks that AG Wathelet is right and that, when he says"[The applicant] must prove that only the trade mark in respect of which registration is sought, as opposed to any other trade marks which may also be present, indicates, without any possibility of confusion, the exclusive origin of the goods or services at issue",he is vindicating the point made by Sir Robin Jacob about "limping marks" back in the 1990s in Philips Electonics NV v… [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
Ariz. 2008) (nominative use); see also Nautilus Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Next up: two-time relist Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Yesterday’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Jacobs covers the second argument yesterday: Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:48 pm
"Giving us some examples of English copyright cases in the musical field, Sir Robin started with the case of Francis Day & Hunter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
