Search for: "US v. Ross" Results 701 - 720 of 1,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm by Jamie Baker
Beyer’s forthcoming article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There are pockets that demand different approaches.Jake Linford: Error costs v. administrative costs. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
He submits that pricing can be used to reduce consumption but must be done in a lawful manner. 1420: Mr O’Neill QC states that all parties have agreed that the legitimate aim of the legislation is as identified by the Court of Justice of the European Union. 1418: Mr O’Neill QC submits that there is a clear acceptance that if you are trying to reduce alcohol consumption by the general population “tax is what does it, as tax covers everyone”. 1418: Mr… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:52 am by Paul Rosenzweig
According to CNet, Ross Compton's house caught on fire. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:24 am by Cannabis Law Group
In 2008, the Supreme Court of California considered an employer’s drug policies in conjunction with an employee’s lawful use of medical marijuana (Ross v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Virginia Matthews also stated in voir dire that she did not use Facebook. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses the court’s decision to review Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:36 am by David Hart QC
Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd and Jacqueline Lewis) v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]