Search for: "United States Department of Fish and Wildlife"
Results 701 - 718
of 718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (The Newhall Land and Farming Company, RPI) (2d Dist. 2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 1245, (“CBD”), (my 12/11/17 post on which can be found here), followed Preserve Wild Santee’s “reasonable, commonsense reading of Section 21189.9” and rejected plaintiffs’ “rigid” and “restrictive” contrary view derived from LandValue 77. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:02 pm
In this part of Colombia, "no roads" is more accurately stated "just jungle. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Rally, inter alia, participated in several calls and email exchanges with officials from NMFS, the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), and the Marine Mammal Commission (“MMC”) regarding the issue. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am
Defendants involved with drugs can be charged with federal or state crimes. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
The City prevailed on all issues but the general plan consistency issue pertaining to whether or not the City properly “coordinated” with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service as called for in the planning document. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drough [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1110, 1135.) [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:11 am
You should call the Department of Justice National Center for Disaster Fraud hotline number: 877-623-3423. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
Most of the East Parcel is also designated Forest and zoned TPZ, except for a 670-acre portion zoned for development of up to 1,360 dwelling units and 6.6 acres of commercial uses. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Furthermore, the discretion of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (the “Department”) to impose conditions that could ameliorate the project’s environmental impacts could not be imputed to the Board. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
The proposed modification would allow the refinery, which has existed and operated at the site through various ownerships since 1932, to unload two unit trains (104 cars) of crude oil (150,000 barrels) per day. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
A property owner sought a demolition permit (for an existing dilapidated home) and design approval for an eight-unit multi-family building. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204. [read post]
