Search for: "United States v. Barnes" Results 701 - 720 of 858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:14 am by Rick Hasen
” - Alexander Keyssar, author of The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States Reviews “Hasen’s timely and factually rich account merits attention from jurists, policy specialists, and government reformers of all political stripes. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
In another essay for the series, Amelia Burnette explores United States Forest Service v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm by Rick Hasen
  Amazon and Barnes and Noble are accepting pre-orders. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:42 am
Here is a link to the 18-page opinion, New Jersey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
 The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Florian Mueller
A renegotiated license agreement is my best guess.Finally, here's the amended complaint: 14-10-03 Amended Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that a defendant had been prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice that a guilty plea would not result in mandatory deportation. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  Here’s why.We recently blogged about new United States Supreme Court certiorari grants of interest. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hunton & Williams Privacy Blog has noted the United States recent statements publically blaming the Russian Government for implementing cyber-attacks on the American energy infrastructure. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide next term whether the Fourth Amendment requires that the government obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers, observing that the case calls on the justices to “puzzle over the implications of an 18th-century rule for a distinctly 21st-century reality. [read post]