Search for: "United States v. Brooks" Results 701 - 720 of 1,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by Luke A. Williams
App. 2012) involved a general question of legal sufficiency in light of the recent case, Brooks v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm by Rick Hasen
”—Alexander Keyssar, author of The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States “Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, and one of the nation’s foremost experts on election law, has published a preview of a new book with a sobering reminder for those of us who oppose the growing body of laws requiring identification in order to vote. . . [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by Russ Bensing
Most of the talk about SCOTUS last week centered on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:35 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Brook, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 136 (14 February 2012) Hussain v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 188 (14 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Burke v The College of Law & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 87 (14 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Towry EJ Ltd v Bennett & Ors [2012] EWHC 224 (QB) (14 February 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
He said: “The key would be to make the cards available only to members of print newsgathering organisations or magazines who have signed up the new body and its code… The public at large would know journalists carrying such cards are bone fide operators committed to a set of standards and a body to who complaints can be made…I think the beauty of the system, the attraction of the system, is it will be the newspaper industry registering and disciplining journalists, not the… [read post]