Search for: "United States v. Garcia" Results 701 - 720 of 827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
This time it's the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ordering summary judgment for the United States on March 10, 2009 in an interpleader action styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v Carrie R. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
Garcia, was brought in the same courtroom against the same two generals by families of the four United States churchwomen who were raped and murdered by members of the Salvadoran National Guard in 1980. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
Garcia, was brought in the same courtroom against the same two generals by families of the four United States churchwomen who were raped and murdered by members of the Salvadoran National Guard in 1980. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 7:55 pm
V tribunals in Iraq, yet we refuse to institute them at Gitmo. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:10 pm
§ 1229c to depart the United States voluntarily at his own expense in lieu of being deported (a right that is available under some circumstances, and was available to Garcia). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
    The American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and another group, the Arc of the United States, urged the Court to take the case of Briseno v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:12 am
Johnson, 654 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Contents include:Guy Goodwin-Gill, International Law Association (Australian Branch) Annual General Meeting AddressAnn Kent, Compliance v Cooperation: China and International LawDonald Keever, The Regulatory Coherence of Multilateral RegulationJo En Low, Engaging with the United Nations Treaty Bodies: A Fruitful Dialogue? [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
  United States v. de Jesús-Ríos, 990 F.2d 672, 677 (1st Cir. 1993). [read post]