Search for: "United States v. Gay" Results 701 - 720 of 1,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
United States, was heard before the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by JB
Among its many other virtues, the opinions in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows a prison inmate to sue the government for an alleged sexual assault committed by guards at a federal prison. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
United States and Yates v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am by Mark Walsh
Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders is here again today, as is James D. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by ALeonard
  Now, engaging in gay sex in private is not a crime of moral turpitude in the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:19 am by Bailey DeSimone
In the United States, the Lavender Scare and subsequent initiatives against LGBTQ+ folks serving the United States in military, foreign, or civil service became a driver of the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am by Jim Martin
In his majority decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering “whether not allowing a criminal defendant to use assets not traceable to a criminal offense to hire counsel of choice violates the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel,” and its relevance for state and local governments. [read post]