Search for: "United States v. Harry" Results 701 - 720 of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm by Victoria Clark
Brenna Gautam recounted last week’s military commisions developments in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
The Florida Supreme Court's ruling was in direct opposition with the law in 48 other states on this issue and essentially aligns Florida with the rest of the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
By now, the United States has had the experience of having a woman of color serve as Vice President—the first time someone who is not white or not a man has held that office. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm by Rosalind English
 In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:09 pm by Robert Loeb
Eisentrager that aliens detained as enemies outside the United States are not “entitled, as a constitutional right, to sue in some court of the United States for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]