Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 701 - 720 of 4,279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am by Keith Mallinson
Delrahim rightly states that “[w]e should not transform commitments to license on FRAND terms into a compulsory licensing scheme. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
By the same reasoning, the court also held excludable from the fixed-price formula the principal and interest payments made by the partners directly to the holder of the unit mortgage. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 7:35 am by Jason Rantanen
United States, 273 U.S. 236, 241 (1927), “No formal granting of a license is necessary in order to give it effect. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 1:39 pm
  When a developer creates a fork, the existing ledger of transactions from the original currency is used, and holders of the original currency are assigned equivalent units of the new currency on the new network. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 9:42 am by Neil Schoenherr
In light of President Donald Trump’s recent attacks on the United States Postal Service, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act should be revised to prohibit racial discrimination in voting by the federal government, says a Washington University in St. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Defense Distributed's efforts were initially met with opposition from the United States Department of State. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am by Paul Rosenzweig
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Terri Nappier
Holder, where the Court invalidated the coverage formula of the Voting Rights Act, several states have enacted very strict voter ID laws. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
The United States of America (‘US’), one of the treaty’s signatories, has adopted Article 1(A) of the Convention without any substantial reservation, understanding or declaration (‘RUDs’). [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
  OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United Nations, and the eight… [read post]