Search for: "United States v. Holmes"
Results 701 - 720
of 867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2010, 6:18 pm
SUMMARY: On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (D.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Holmes County Cmty. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
MN Mining and Mfg (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Delay alone does not establish prejudice necessary for prosecution laches defense: The Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
MN Mining and Mfg (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Delay alone does not establish prejudice necessary for prosecution laches defense: The Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
In an article published more than a decade ago, I noted that there are at least three ways to understand the presumption against extraterritoriality: (1) that acts of Congress should presumptively apply only to conduct in the United States regardless of whether the conduct causes effects in the United States (Justice Holmes’s view in American Banana); (2) that acts of Congress should presumptively apply only to conduct that causes effects in the… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
" United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:30 am
That is how a judge lives in a state of trust, and I know of no other way to make good on the aspirations that tell us who we are, and who we mean to be, as the people of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
Bakke (1977); and Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
United States). [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:38 am
When such a result is possible, the Solicitor General of the United States generally appears as amicus curiae to defend the federal law.What did SG Kagan say to the Supreme Court in this case? [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
Florida United States v. [read post]
