Search for: "United States v. Kennedy"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm
For now, business method patents live on, and United States patent law remains mostly unchanged by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:06 am
(Here‘s the 2d Circuit on that opinion: The Court is aware of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
While Mason’s resentencing was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided Hurst v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Bilski I wrote previously about my uneasiness with the United States Supreme Court’s apparent unfamiliarity with current technology. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Patricia Millett will argue United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how to make sense of what went on behind closed doors in a jury deliberation that produced several acquittals but also deadlocked on other factually related counts. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Immigration lawyers, reeling from yesterday’s defeat in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
But, the First states that either Justice Kennedy's standard or the plurality's standard, announced in Rapanos v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Briefs LEXIS 30, in League of United Latin Am. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Check the United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:45 am
Share On Monday, April 25, the court hears oral argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:24 am
” In The Atlantic, Matt Ford views Maslenjak v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:11 am
Justice Kennedy had recused himself from this case. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
United States, No. 08-1301. [read post]
