Search for: "United States v. Li"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, as well as their subsidiaries will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war and to sow division in our Union. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
” (Here, on the defendant’s dime).United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:22 am
The law should also grant courts the power to craft equitable remedies for persons like the plaintiffs in Li v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In other words, a statutory initiative such as Proposition 187, like a state constitutional amendment, lies outside the control of the legislature to undo or modify. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:17 am
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
Helen Norton Suppose the United States elected a president with authoritarian tendencies. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
By Nicole Greenstein C’14Professors Lillian BeVier, Theodore Ruger and Arlen SpecterOn Monday, November 21, a crowd of students and faculty convened in Penn Law’s Gittis Hall for a debate on the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
(See, for example, United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 2:43 pm
Held v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:28 pm
Meanwhile, in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
One obvious provision is Section 604, which amends the Bank Holding Company Act to direct the Federal Reserve to consider, when it evaluates an application for approval of a proposed acquisition, merger, or consolidation, whether it would result in greater or more concentrated risks to the stability of the United States banking or financial system. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:52 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia applied these principles in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 4:16 am
Lofton, et.al. v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:16 am
Lofton, et.al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:02 am
In Fazaga v. [read post]
