Search for: "United States v. New York"
Results 701 - 720
of 15,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2018, 4:20 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Greater Birmingham Ministries v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:13 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law After the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Asignacion sought to have the Philippine arbitral award set aside in the United States under the public policy exception in Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Court of Appeals of New York 2014). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
In a case titled United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 am
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
For a copy of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 3:06 am
The case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 10:44 am
Luis Alfredo Motta Dominguez, et al, Case No. 1:19-CR-20388: Indictment Eastern District of New York United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:18 pm
On April 14, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the May 4, 2010 judgment issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in the case of Zapolski v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:57 pm
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals held that executives are "employees" within the meaning of the State's Labor Law. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
PERB rules employer’s conducting a survey of unit members to determine if a recognized or certified collective bargaining agent should continue to represent the unit an improper employer practice Matter of Monroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
