Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 701 - 720 of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2014, 10:36 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
House of Brides subsequently brought an action in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, for violations of the Sherman Act, and state antitrust and unfair competition laws. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Diane Marie Amann
 In 2007, after an arbitration in the United States, a panel of three arbitrators issued a final award. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Schwab of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a post-Koken decision in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:30 am by Orin Kerr
§ 1441(a), which allows removal of civil actions “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
”  According to the complaint, the other conspirators agreed not to pursue Carrier’s business, resulting in “artificially inflated and supra-competitive prices for ACR Copper Tubing in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
Although for many years there have been grey market problems in the United States with electronics and cameras, it was not a big problem with software. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:31 pm
If you have an interest in both ERISA and in well written, logical judicial opinions, I can’t recommend highly enough this opinion, by Judge Gertner of the United States District Court for Massachusetts, in Bendaoud v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:46 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
(which, for convenience, we refer to collectively and in the singular as “Walgreen”) operate retail pharmacies throughout the United States. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
According to the Court, an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]