Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 701 - 720 of 5,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 6:17 am
In a recent case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, plaintiffs brought a putative class action against various defendants involved in milk production, alleging they violated the antitrust laws of fifteen states and Washington, D.C. by engaging in a conspiracy to limit the production and  increase the price of raw milk. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am by John J. Burke
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
That court had followed the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Double AA International Investment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am by Anushila Shaw
  As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic  v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
The Court of Chancery held that plaintiff former common unitholders failed to state a claim for breach of fiduciary duties in connection with the general partner’s alleged wrongful exercise of its call right to purchase all of the common units after the price of those units plummeted following the general partner’s public announcement of its intent to exercise the call right. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
In United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land, No. 07-35310 (Sep. 29, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court should not have refused to admit evidence of sales at properties nearby the property taken, even though the sales occurred after the taking. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm by Mike
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) (see Kat friend Richard Vary's comment in the last update here). [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog]   Other United States v. [read post]