Search for: "V D" Results 701 - 720 of 76,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2008, 2:53 am
R v Porter; [2008] WLR (D) 167 “There was no obligation upon an employer in the conduct of his undertaking to guard against those risks which were merely fanciful. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:47 am
R v Sivaraman; [2008] WLR (D) 256 “There was no rule of law to the effect that, for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the amount of the benefit to each of the co-conspirators to a fraud must be taken as the whole amount of the loss attributable to the fraud: the amount of the benefit might vary as between the co-conspirators, and was to be determined on a common sense appreciation of the particular facts of the case. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:25 am
R v M; [2008] WLR (D) 297 “Where a defendant in criminal proceedings was said to have breached a restraint order, imposed under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, by making certain prohibited transactions a judge of the Crown Court had jurisdiction to try an application made by the prosecution for the defendant to be committed for contempt. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:25 am
R v May [2008] UKHL 28; [2008] WLR (D) 151 “Where co-defendants had jointly received property as a result of criminal activity, each was liable to receive a confiscation order representing the entire value, as if he had acted alone, provided he had sufficient assets to meet the order. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:08 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 185; [2008] WLR (D) 47 “The offence of possessing a document containing information ‘of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’ was only committed if the document concerned was of a kind that was likely to provide practical assistance to such a person, rather than simply encouraging the commission of terrorist acts. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am by sally
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public security’ pursuant to… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:14 am by sally
Regina (Preston) v Wandsworth London Borough Council and another [2012] EWCA Civ 1378 ; [2012] WLR (D) 295 “A British citizen who had not been resident in the United Kingdom for over 15 years could not vote in the United Kingdom parliamentary election within the meaning of section 1(3) of the Representation of the People Act 1985, as amended. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by sally
Cathie and another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWCA Civ 739; [2012] WLR (D) 168 “In the context of determining whether to disqualify a company director for misconduct in the direction of an insolvent company the use of the expression ‘exceptional circumstances’ was better avoided. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by sally
E v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another [2012] EWCA Civ 938; [2012] WLR (D) 204 “In a case in which a Roman Catholic parish priest was said to have abused a young girl, and the question arose, as to potential vicarious liability, whether he was an employee, independent contractor, or in some other manner to be considered akin to an employee, the law as to vicarious liability was to be extended such that the question should be approached in a broader way, and… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:23 am by sally
Regina (Gallagher and another) v Basildon District Council [2010] EWHC 2824 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 28 “There was no obligation on a local authority to implement recommendations of a local commissioner, nor was it necessary for a local authority to have cogent reasons for refusing to follow such a recommendation; but if a local authority gave reasons for rejecting a recommendation, the court was entitled to examine whether it had taken into account irrelevant considerations… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:05 am by sally
Grays Timber Products Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] UKSC 4; [ 2010] WLR (D) 21 “In assessing whether employment-related securities had been disposed of for a consideration which exceeded their ‘market value’, so as to occasion a charge to income tax, it was necessary to postulate a notional sale between a hypothetical vendor and purchaser, with the personal characteristics of the actual vendor, such as his right under a subscription agreement to a… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by sally
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 9:34 pm by Patent Docs
District Court Finds Claims Directed to Method for Analyzing Enoxaparin Sample to Be Patent Eligible By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Ni-Q, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:39 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, in Tangelo IP, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:43 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:17 pm by scanner1
STEVENS as Trustees of the Teisinger Stevens Wicklund Royalty Trust, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]