Search for: "VERMONT v. NEW YORK"
Results 701 - 720
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
App.), cert. denied, 662 P.2d 645 (N.M. 1983).New York: Mulhall v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:11 am
However, on the topic of whose responsibility it is to raise the issue of a reasonable accommodation, the law has been fairly clear in the Second Circuit (which covers Connecticut, New York and Vermont) that it is the employee that bears the burden of making that initial request. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:35 pm
Gokey, 457 N.E.2d 723, 724 (N.Y. 1983) (stating that under the New York Constitution, "a warrantless search incident to arrest [is] unreasonable unless justified by the presence of exigent circumstances"); Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 3:13 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which covers New York, Vermont, and Connecticut, concluded that the intake questionnaire did in fact serve as a “charge. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
In both Vermont and New Jersey, the courts accepted equal protection arguments and then threw the issue of remedy to the legislature. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:39 am
According to a recent Second Circuit decision (which covers employers in Connecticut, New York and Vermont), the answer is still no. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Accordingly, unless the case is brought in the 2nd Circuit (with jurisdiction over New York, Connecticut and Vermont) where such a claim is not likely to succeed, the use of another’s trademark(s) in metatags and keywords is most likely a “use in commerce” and the only question left to decide is whether there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 12:30 am
The court held that plaintiff failed to name any individual responsible for the claimed denials.Chabad.org News reported on Sunday that Vermont has settled Bock v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
, Erik Turkewitz on his New York Personal Injury Law Blog, and Dan Markel of the collective PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
, Erik Turkewitz on his New York Personal Injury Law Blog, and Dan Markel of the collective PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm
In New York, an appellate court held a man ineligible for survivor’s benefits under Workers’ Compensation Law because that law permits benefits to a surviving spouse, not to the survivor of a civil union entered into in Vermont. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
(v) The tax brackets reported are for single individuals. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 9:15 am
It's just a little bit ironic that on this Good Friday, the Second Circuit decided a case that will be very important to religious institutions in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:42 pm
In Martinez, a New York State appellate court in Rochester recognized a Canadian same-sex marriage as legally valid in the state. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:42 pm
But if those same plaintiffs sue those same drug companies in a federal court in the Second Circuit (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont), the plaintiffs do not automatically lose. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
In that new case, Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, are all endeavoring to end “workplace bullying. [read post]
