Search for: "Virgin v. Virgin"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Instead, we have a case like the Virgin Wireless case, which says the intent factor isn’t meaningful but we apply it anyway. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:41 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Williams & Ors v Redcard Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 466 (20 April 2011) Berezovsky & Anor v Edmiston & Company Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 431 (19 April 2011) Finurba Corporate Finance Ltd v Sipp SA & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 465 (20 April 2011) Okafor & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 499 (20 April 2011) Vestergaard Frandsen SA ( MVf3 APS) & Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd &… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
This case is all about seats for airplanes If you are a patent-y person, you may have been following the fiercely contested litigation in Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited v v Premium Aircraft Interiors (UK) Limited (noted here by Matt the Kat). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
British Virgin Islands International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to the British Virgin Islands was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Massachusetts – A good tacking decision: Boathouse Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:00 am
GSS Group Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:32 pm
See Reitz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (H) v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 730 (29 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Sportradar GmbH & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 330 (29 March 2011) Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 303 (29 March 2011) Gemstar- Tvguide International Inc & Ors v Virgin Media Ltd & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 302 (29 March 2011) Faulkner, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:13 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
The Supreme Court case details are here and our case preview is here.On Thursday 31 March, Lords Walker, Collins and Kerr will hear a permission to appeal in respect of Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors (UK) Ltd. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 9:41 pm
People of the Virgin Islands, 53 V.I. 395, 2010 V.I. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard) Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:52 am
Wikipedia (which, of course, is always reliable) and several other websites suggest that the iron maiden is actually of much more recent origin and that the “maiden” in question is likely the Virgin Mary. [read post]
