Search for: "Vs. IN THE INTEREST OF"
Results 701 - 720
of 9,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
The seminar will consist of the following sessions: • Introduction to the European Patent Convention • EP Case Law of Interest • EP Claim Drafting Specialties • Opposition • Unitary Patent • Moderated Panel Discussion: EPC (UPP) vs. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 5:34 pm
In this edition of the Kennedy-Mighell Report, host Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell decipher the meaning of “legal technology” in 2019 as well as legal tech vs. illegal tech. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
· Fence vs. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:32 am
§104(a)(2) came to the forefront in federal court beginning with an unpublished case arising out of Michigan, entitled Kovacs vs. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
OSTER VS. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:29 pm
In this edition of the Kennedy-Mighell Report, host Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell decipher the meaning of “legal technology” in 2019 as well as legal tech vs. illegal tech. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
vs. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 11:52 am
Freedom of Speech, Not Freedom From Consequences, an article about the recent controversy on Singapore’s reaction to US Citizen and former Singaporan lawyer Gopolan Nair who was arrested, detained and released on bail for "taunting a Singaporan judge" raises some interesting questions about the freedom of expression. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:29 am
Last week the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals issued a decision on a long-running dispute over reservation of a royalty interest in a deed. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:23 pm
Deportation, appeals, and conditional sentences as “terms of imprisonment” – the case of Tran vs. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:30 am
Aside from that, I found the part about Airbus and Boeing being "polite" in the face of potential Chinese competition to be interesting. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:48 pm
The most interesting story out of last night’s Republican debate is probably the one written up by McKay Coppins here: In several different moments we watched a preview of the way that Ted Cruz intends to go after Marco Rubio if and when the field begins to winnow and the two of them rise toward the top. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:19 am
Interesting article by the New York Times’s resident ethicist, Randy Cohen (from the 12/6/09 Sunday Magazine) on whether a company can ethically refuse to hire a candidate because of political views: You may not. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:14 pm
Interesting post from the WSJ Health Blog on Medical Justice's new ratings-permission contracts (press release on service).This new service offered by Medical Justice appears designed to attempt to control the evolving growth of health care consumer driven rating information provided through companies like RateMDs.com.According to Medical Justice's CEO the goal is to "regain control of the flow of information. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:11 am
[The American Interest; CTNewsJunkie.com] P.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 5:19 am
This interesting post (using this case as its starting point) is worth reading, especially given its resonance with issues we've discussed in recent months. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
For Loughlin, this loss of political authority is connected, at least in part, to constitutionalism: the “reprocessing of democratic will-formation through the language of rights—the rights of speech and association, the right to vote, and the right to political equality—leads to individualization and thus significantly undermines the ability of collective organizations like political parties and interest groups to build coalitions of interests. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:43 am
(And if you're interested in legal ethics and aren't a member of the ABA's Center for Professional Responsibility, you should join, with receipt of The Professional Lawyer being only one of the benefits.) [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:14 pm
An interesting book review by Richard A. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
” An LLC member had assigned her interest to the plaintiff without the managers’ written consent. [read post]
