Search for: "WEST v. CALIFORNIA" Results 701 - 720 of 2,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
     Review Granted in California Water Impact Network On November 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court granted review of the previously published Second District case of California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Robert Liles
Mobile Dentistry in Texas – An Overview of Regulatory Risk Areas to be Considered(December 7, 2018):  Each state sets their own licensure requirements, rules and regulations regarding the practice of dentistry, all of which are subject to change. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:29 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky and Sahara Pynes
 Last April’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The deciding factor was California's strong public policy that I have discussed often, which bars non-competes for employees.Conversely, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed a slightly different question in NuVasive, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
United States Denton’s Privacy and Cybersecurity law Blog has analysed California’s much debated California Consumer Privacy Act 2018. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by Jacobs Paul
The California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
The US legislature is currently undergoing a series of calls for a federal data privacy law; the implementation of a new privacy law in the state of California and the post-GDPR environment has prompted movement from stakeholders. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:33 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
” Last month the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of a California District Court Judge’s in the case John Doe I, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm by Anthony Zaller
Border Transportation Group, LLC, analyzes the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]