Search for: "WILSON v. STATE" Results 701 - 720 of 3,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In the article, Professor Wilson discusses the policy behind the Federal Arbitration Act and critiques the high court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:48 am
and the following issue specified by the Court: WHETHER, UNDER UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
Mr Ver was represented by Iain Wilson and Tom Double of Brett Wilson LLP and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Ian Helme of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
From the Table of Authorities (Cases) section of appellant's opening brief (left) and the amended appellant's opening brief (right) in Laguna HW, LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
From the Eleventh Circuit's decision yesterday in Anderson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]