Search for: "Waits v State"
Results 701 - 720
of 12,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Dixon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
Here it is: Kluge v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
But wait a minute? [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:07 am
In 2011, Mr K, via solicitors, informed Westminster that he had left the property and was waiting for Westminster to arrange private sector accommodation for him. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
United States). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Can Berkeley wait to extend natural-gas service until the building owner actually puts an EPCA-covered appliance inside the building? [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
As I noted in the Verdict column, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:10 am
” Rapp v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
In particular, the SEC chose not to require corresponding quarterly disclosures and a cooling-off period with respect to the adoption of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements by the issuer, preferring to take a wait-and-see approach. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
In Krimstock v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:49 am
See McKay v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am
* The Court also issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am
* The Court also issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Fagan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Supreme Court faulted plaintiff for waiting until 2020 to commence this action to recover monies owed as a result of a legal representation that ended in 2015 but, as prejudgment interest only compensates the judgment creditor for the loss of use of money he or she was owed and is not a penalty, the “responsibility for the delay [in bringing suit] should not be the controlling factor in deciding whether interest is to be computed” (Love v State of New York, 78… [read post]