Search for: "Walker v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 1,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
He did not work for NME and was never discarded by the IPC as a possible editor for the magazine.” Jeremy Clarke-Williams, Russell Jones Walker, acted for the claimant. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am by Administrator
Feldman filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We also have some SCOTUS talk on LXBN TV as Antoinette Konski joins us to talk Mayo v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:20 pm by Alfred Brophy
From the OUP website: The Civil Rights movement that emerged in the United States after World War II was a reaction against centuries of racial discrimination. [read post]
Lord Roger, with whom Lord Walker and Lord Collins agreed, was also content to ground his understanding of persecution in a right that does expressly exist within international human rights law. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-8023; Walker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:09 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Sanade, Harrison & Walker v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKUT 00048(IAC) – Read judgment. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Dan Bushell
Gore and Ted Olson, who represented former President Bush in that case, and served as Solicitor General after it -- could come up with a way to convince the courts (most importantly, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States) to find a Constitutionally protected right to same-sex marriage. [read post]