Search for: "Warren v. Warren" Results 701 - 720 of 3,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 6:20 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Parti Québécois to unveil secular charter Tuesday Testing the climate for worker-choice laws Editorial: Good move on legal expense insurance United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Powell, Jr.Anders Walker shows how a generation of scholars and judges has misinterpreted Powell’s definition of diversity in the landmark case Regents v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the op-ed, I give the examples of Chief Justices John Marshall in the early Republic and Earl Warren in the 1950s and 1960s. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Eisenstadt, Temple University, has posted Enemy and Ally: Religion in Loving v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:00 am by VALL Blog Master
Bridgeman, associate general counsel, Freddie MacDeborah V. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:This Essay, prepared for a Notre Dame Law Review symposium on the catalysts of constitutional change during the twentieth century, takes as its focus the Warren Court’s landmark decision in Griswold v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply the… [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:36 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
See Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González. [read post]