Search for: "Washington v. Cooper"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
In additional to national media, Washington specialists such as National Journal, Roll Call and The Hill can provide useful background on personal and political dynamics. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
Ryan Scoville discussed Congress’ role in international diplomacy, following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:29 pm
” This clear-and-convincing-evidence standard, the court held in today’s Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 9:30 pm
As the opinions in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:21 am
While cursed with a boring name, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
Officials involved in the investigation added that they have yet to find any indication that the two gunmen were directed by ISIS, but noted that the shooters were probably inspired by the group, the Washington Post notes. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:25 am
(International Legal Organization for Cooperation and Development), con sede en Madrid. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is in Washington today meeting with President Obama. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:11 am
Supreme Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:48 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
As the opinions in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Michigan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
(Strickland was a capital case.)This panel questioned the validity of prior Ninth Circuit decisions like Cooper-Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:35 am
[Postscript: Given all the discussion of federalism questions related to King v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Furthermore, if, following the opinion, we admit that the Member States are under an obligation (of loyal cooperation) to ratify the UPC Agreement, this Agreement, which contains the major rules defining patent protection and instituting a new court and its rules of jurisdiction, would not have been subject to any form of decision by neither the European Parliament nor the national parliaments. [read post]
