Search for: "Weiss v. Weiss" Results 701 - 720 of 1,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 5:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is binding precedent that the rules of res judicata apply to the decisions of a bankruptcy court” (Winkler v Weiss, 294 AD2d 428, 429 [2d Dept 2002]). [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine, 45 N.Y.2d 730, 732, 408 N.Y.S.2d 475, 380 N.E.2d 302 (N.Y. 1978), and Becker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Florian Mueller
But Nokia avers that its products only process something that can be described as pseudo-planar: instead of separate U and V planes, there's a single data block containing a pair of U and V values for each pixel. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
Chillin' Competition has offered a rather more competition-flavoured account of the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling yesterday in Case C-170/13 Huawei v ZTE, a ruling which to this Kat gave a somewhat shortish shrift yesterday. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:24 am
Devaiah on the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Ryanair v PR Aviation, on whether the"you can't contract out" provisions of the Database Directive apply to data that isn't protected as well as to data which is. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises… [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
  To find a statutory basis for jurisdiction, the court looked to Weiss v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d 828, 830; Kliger-Weiss Infosystems, Inc. v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 159 AD3d 683, 684). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine, 45 NY2d 730), is merely a recognition of the factual particularities of proving proximate cause and damages in such an action. [read post]