Search for: "White v. Does 1-21" Results 701 - 720 of 904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2011, 8:04 am by Zachary Spilman
This week at the Supremes:  On 3 Oct 11 the Supreme Court denied the IFP motion in White v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part II: Summary and Criticisms of the Advisory Panel’s Recommendations 1. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am by Rick Hasen
  One proposal the grand jury thought worthy of study was to require identification from voters at the time of registration (which New York now does) and voting (which New York does not do). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm by Susan Brenner
After being charged with conspiring to import 500 grams or more of cocaine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs, in their positions five to 21 years, never previously challenged the unclassified nature of their jobs http://j.st/S4w  Iowa Assurance Corp., et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Now, a federal district court has ruled on a habeas petition by a defendant convicted under the Florida statute, holding in Shelton v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm by Michael O'Hear
Now, a federal district court has ruled on a habeas petition by a defendant convicted under the Florida statute, holding in Shelton v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
July 21, 2011), defendant pleaded no contest to three charges of sexually abusing his stepson, and was sentenced to three consecutive 1-to-15-year prison terms. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
White of the Northern District of California agreed with five title insurance companies and their affiliates that the Supreme Court's ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Malayasia Int’l Shipping,[1] the Supreme Court offered a new synthesis of the federal doctrine of forum non conveniens. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Malayasia Int’l Shipping,[1] the Supreme Court offered a new synthesis of the federal doctrine of forum non conveniens. [read post]