Search for: "Witte v. WITTE" Results 701 - 720 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an injunction against the NSA's bulk metadata collection program in Klayman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
According to the EU judges, the Commission should have proven that the profits at issue were taxable under Irish law, as interpreted by the Irish High Court8)Murphy (Inspector of Taxes) v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
[iv] The explicit reference to Article IV of the WTO Agreement[v], Article XXIV of GATS[vi]  and Article VI:4 of GATS in the recitals to the Decision on Domestic Regulation makes clear the mandate of the CTS – to formulate the necessary disciplines on domestic regulation. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf will testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Aug. 6 regarding the deployment of federal officers to Portland, Oregon. [read post]
[v] The negotiating history of the SCM Agreement suggests that the focus of the SCM Agreement was on addressing trade-distorting subsidies offered by Members in their own ‘territories’. [read post]