Search for: "YOUNGER v. THE STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2007, 1:40 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeInjunction Preventing Plaintiff's Prosecution In State Court Denied; 'Younger' Doctrine Cited Ma'at El v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:13 am
The first, ENvironnement JEUnesse v Procureur General du Canada, was a Quebec case filed in 2018. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:03 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:25 pm
Ed. 2d 49 (2000), and the NJ Supreme Court in Moriarty v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:08 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Five years later, in Graham v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
This, said the court, constituted evidence “of intentional destruction sufficient to show a culpable state of mind on Cromwell's part. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:47 pm
In reaching its decision, the court cited the BMG Canada v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
Briefly, in the matter of M.A. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:25 pm
It is like other non-jurisdictional, nonmerits "threshhold grounds" that the Court has allowed district courts to decide before jurisdiction (e.g., Younger abstention, Totten doctrine, discretionary adjudication of state-law claims). [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 9:26 am
They range from a Class B Misdemeanor (first offense) to a Second Degree Felony if the person with whom the actor agrees to engage in sexual conduct is: younger than 18 years of age, regardless of whether the actor knows the age of the person at the time of the offense; represented to the actor as being younger than 18 years of age; or believed by the actor to be younger than 18 years of age. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
The decision of R. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
The decision of R. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:00 am
[Here is the citation for the Honorary Fellowship of the American Society for Legal History for Víctor Tau Anzoátegui. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm
., State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:54 pm
Turning to the testimony of the chair of the 2009 rating panel, the court noted that he stated they were looking for someone with experience in reactor nuclear core design and loading, which the younger candidate did not have. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:56 pm
In Draughn v. [read post]
