Search for: "Yorker v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2009, 12:55 am
” In Kelo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Thus New Yorkers need not worry that police without warrants or cause could attach such devices to their vehicles in New York and record the vehicles' minute by minute location.In People v Buchanan (6/30/09) the Court again found that the New York Constitution provides protections that have not been clearly found under the United State Constitution. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:10 am
Chubb, and Presbyterian Hospital v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
04/21/09 Mirror of Justice Blog:"Here are a couple of letters to the speaker of the Connecticut house arguing for meaningful religious liberty exemptions in the bill [to implement the state supreme court's October 2008 decision in Kerrigan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court's 1996 Romer v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth' (Masson v New… [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
No such proposals should be made that would require the violation of a collective bargaining agreement currently in force.G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twentieth day of February in the year two thousand nine.David A. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:00 am
In Matter of People of State of New York v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
In a decision released yesterday, a second court in New York State has recognized the validity of a Canadian same-sex marriage.Law.com reports:Recognizing the validity of a same-sex marriage between New Yorkers contracted in Canada, a Manhattan surrogate has ruled that a man is entitled to inherit the entire estate of his deceased male partner. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:19 am
The circular letter draws on the Insurance Department’s Office of General Counsel Opinion 08-11-05 (Nov. 21, 2008), which analyzed, inter alia, Martinez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:19 pm
Indeed, the Court’s most recent preemption decision (Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
United States: hard cases make bad law. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:08 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
Although same-sex couples living in Massachusetts can marry there, a 1913 statute prevents New Yorkers from taking advantage of that, because it prohibits issuing licenses to non-resident couples who could not marry in their own state. [read post]
