Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 7181 - 7200 of 9,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Other immigration restrictionists, however, have taken note of the contrast between Arizona and Illinois. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm by Ken White
That decision flew in the face of Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Jonathan Spontarelli
California: State Supreme Court Removes Measure to Split California into Three States from November BallotLos Angeles Times – Maura Dolan | Published: 7/18/2018 The California Supreme Court blocked a proposal to split California into three states from appearing as a ballot measure in November. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
 The FACDL has however promised to quickly address the new Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:08 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Supreme Court issues its decision next month on the constitutionality of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:00 am by Laura Valade
Instead, the court applied the heightened standard for postnuptial agreements set forth in the Arizona Supreme Court case, In re Harber’s Estate, 104 Ariz. 79, 449 P2d 7 (1969). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am by Tom Joscelyn
Chesebro also advised that the “President of the Senate” could disregard court decisions because he “can make his own judgment” that state courts “violated due process. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm by Ellena Erskine
Sheetz came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to apply the court’s Nolland/Dolan test and find the county’s fee a violation of the takings clause. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:45 am by Matt Brown
Here’s what our Supreme Court said: Criminal contempt is the commission of a disrespectful act directed at the court itself which obstructs justice; civil contempt is the disobedience of a court order directing an act for the benefit or advantage of the opposing party to the litigation. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:06 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article The Supreme Court in the Early Republic: The Chief Justiceships of John Jay and Oliver Ellsworth is cited in the following article: John Mikhail, Does Originalism Have a Natural Law Problem? [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:02 am by Andrea Woods
And when trial courts find that our clients’ rights were violated, courts of appeals ignore the record and go out of their way to reverse course — most notably when the Supreme Court recently paused a court order requiring increased protections in the Orange County Jail without offering any explanation, and despite rising COVID infections and dishonesty by jail officials (called out as “bad behavior” by Justice Sotomayor in her… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
The next day, on April 21, 2022, the Superior Court of Arizona, for Maricopa County, dismissed two such election challenges. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:56 pm by Larry
That means it may well be teed up for Supreme Court review. [read post]