Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
The ADF brief also effectively quotes from the Supreme Court's 2004 Lockyer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:28 pm
In Paniagua v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 11:08 am
California, 380 U.S. 609, 14 L. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
United States, in which a same-sex couple married in California (during the period after the Supreme Court of California's ruling and before the voters approved Proposition 8) challenges, in a California federal district court, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted by Congress in 1996. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
United States, in which a same-sex couple married in California (during the period after the Supreme Court of California's ruling and before the voters approved Proposition 8) challenges, in a California federal district court, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted by Congress in 1996. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:01 pm
In Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
In Logtale, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 10:02 pm
In Banas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:02 pm
In Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. the defendant Technologies, LLC, California District Judge Susan Illston denied the plaintiff’s motion for terminating sanctions against the defendant for late, non-searchable productions, but did order the defendant to produce documents in a searchable format with metadata and extended the pretrial schedule so that the plaintiff would not be prejudiced by the late productions. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:13 am
” (DLSE Operations and Procedures Manual (1989) § 10.88; see also California Manufacturers Assn. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:11 pm
The amicus brief on behalf of appellants is signed by a gazillion people, and might accurately be titled "Amicus Brief of Most of the Huge Law Firms In California, All of Whom Are Jonesing For PPP and None of Whom Want to Be Conflicted Out. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:55 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:03 am
A recent California case, Laughman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 10:52 am
LEXIS 80075 (ED CA, June 6, 2013), a California federal magistrate judge denied an inmate summary judgement, holding that his mere assertion that as a Buddhist he requires a vegetarian diet is not enough to establish as a matter of law that his beliefs are sincere and that vegetarianism is a tenet of his religion.In Maloney v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:12 pm
(See Loral Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:12 pm
(See Loral Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm
On April 16, 2008, a California Appellate Court decided Bradstreet v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:09 pm
The plaintiffs alleged that the nursing home was understaffed and underfunded, which ultimately led to the death of their mother, a resident at the facility.Under California law, punitive damages cannot be awarded against a corporation unless an officer, director, or managing agent of the corporation committed, authorized, or ratified the punishable conduct. [read post]
