Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 8,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
Case citation: Sen v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 8:40 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:38 pm
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809 and Antoniades v Villiers; A-G Securities v Vaughan [1990] AC 417, HL. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:32 am
Here’s what you can expect from the Court’s next crop of cases.R. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
Donnelly and Allegheny v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:36 am
In Farro v Schochet, ___ AD3d___, 2021 NY Slip Op 00150 [2d Dept Jan 13. 2021], Peter and I persuaded a Brooklyn appeals court to rule, based upon Sections 1002 (f) and (g) of the Limited Liability Company Law, that a limited liability company member forced out of a business in a lawful cash-out a/k/a “squeeze-out” or “freeze-out” merger lacks (with limited exceptions) any legal right to attack the validity of the merger, or to have it set aside or… [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Cement Mason Local brought a shareholder derivative action against 13 of Regeneron’s current and former members of the ten-member board, alleging they awarded themselves excessive compensation packages, including cash, equity, and stock options, as Regeneron’s finances were declining precipitously. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm
In the new case, Vasquez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
The F Word v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
Brock v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am
The reasons are many: divergent interests between outside investors and inside managers and talent, opportunity for siphoning cash receipts, sloppy accounting, poorly drafted or no owner agreement, an owner opening a competitive business, and more. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Hartford and Macomber v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:20 pm
., EM Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
The Court directed Hodak to submit a proposed order/judgment “which provides for the appointment of a receiver to wind down the corporation, conduct an accounting of the assets and debts of the corporation, sell its assets in a commercially reasonable manner and direct that the debts of the corporation be paid from the proceeds of sale and any cash on hand . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:16 am
Ineneke v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 5:04 pm
” Ketchum v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
” By conditioning eligibility to vote on the payment of LFOs, the plaintiffs argued, the Florida legislature placed a tax on voting as surely as if it had required ex-felons to make cash payments of $1.50 per year—a poll tax that the Supreme Court found invalid in Harman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:53 am
” (Kakollu v Vadlamudi, 21A-DC-96 [Ind Ct App July 26, 2021]). [read post]
